Partnering with commercial businesses can be a great way for nonprofit organizations to fundraise. Over the past decade, cause-marketing relationships between nonprofit and commercial businesses have grown exponentially in popularity. Campaigns like Yoplait Save Lids to Save Lives, Dove’s Campaign for Real Beauty, American Express’ The Members Project, Nike’s Livestrong Bracelets, and The Gap’s Product Red are all great examples of long-term cause marketing relationships that have helped generate millions of dollars for their respective charities.
Churches and other religious institutions are supposed to be places of peace and refuge. Yet they inherently draw people with deep hurts, brewing anger, and even unstable mental illnesses. What should responsible church leaders do when faced with a person who threatens violence or otherwise poses a danger to others?
Freedom Path and Free Speech: New 501(c)(4) Challenge to Constitutionality of IRS’s Speech-Related Regulations
A newly filed lawsuit by Freedom Path, Inc. squarely pits the First Amendment’s free speech protections against the IRS’s questionable “facts and circumstances” test for evaluating politically-tinged issue advocacy activities of tax-exempt organizations. Freedom Path is a conservative section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization that engages in issue advocacy activities affecting politics. In its lawsuit filed April 28, 2014, against former IRS official Lois Lerner, other “unknown” IRS officials, and the IRS itself, Freedom Path claims it was unfairly targeted. Freedom Path’s complaint describes unreasonable IRS delays in processing its tax-exemption application, unwarranted requests for additional information, and illegal release of confidential information by IRS officials to the media.
As Freedom Path asserts in its complaint, “this lawsuit presents a rare opportunity to challenge Defendant IRS’s unconstitutionally vague and ambiguous ‘facts and circumstances’ test used to analyze [Freedom Path’s] activities, a test which is in direct conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court’s clear guidelines relating to issue advocacy and campaign speech in Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.” (WRTL). The significance of Freedom Path’s lawsuit is that it seeks to enforce the rule of law – that is, to make the IRS obey the US Supreme Court’s landmark decision as the supreme law of the land.
A. Freedom Path’s Constitutional Journey
Freedom Path’s odyssey began in March 2011, when it applied to the IRS for recognition as a section 501(c)(4) social welfare organization. Freedom Path then waited for nearly one full year, with no substantive response from the IRS.
According to its complaint, Freedom Path next received “voluminous and probing requests for additional information” from the IRS in February 2012. Despite serious problems with the requests, Freedom Path responded with comprehensive answers on June 3, 2012. The IRS then waited until February 2013 to follow up. In the meantime, the IRS allegedly disclosed Freedom Path’s confidential tax information to an investigative news organization called ProPublica, which then publicly disclosed it.